Monday, February 3, 2014

Admit it. We all are racist. Yes. And only we can change ourselves.

Are we racist by nature? Are we inherently racist? Each one of us.

This question has been in my mind ever since the news of Nido Taniam's death broke out on national television. Richard Loitam, Reigamphy, Bony Jajo - some more names - youngsters who should have been between us, pursuing their profession/education. Yet they are no more. Would I go to the extent of calling each of these as "racial crimes"? May be, may not be - there is a judicial process underway and I hope that answers this question than us jumping up and down on social media. Civil society rightly has joined the discussion. Politicians have as well - yesterday it was Narendra Modi, today it was Rahul Gandhi, and tomorrow it will be Arvind. If they are genuinely concerned, I would be happy, but this being a election year, I look at them with suspicion. Well I look at them with suspicion at the best of times.

But what I am sure is we (all of us - whether from north, south, east, west or north east ) are inherently racist in our outlook. Racism what does the word mean? A quick search brought up  - " the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races." And trust me Racism will mean the same in any language of the world.

Let me ask you this. How many time while looking for a place to rent a place, have you been asked if you are vegetarian or non vegetarian. How many times have you been asked your marital status? How many times have you been mocked at if you look/dress a bit different than the environment you are in. In North India, I have been told everyone from South is called "Madrasi" which I think is a bit over rated. But what is closer to the truth is that everyone thinks Dosa and Idly are the only food that people eat, and that every thing is cooked in coconut oil. Similarly if you know Hindi, you are North Indian down south. Ever seen how auto drivers change their body language in Chennai/Bangalore the moment they realize that you don't speak the native language of the land. When MNS threatens migrant workers, it also a form of racism. When people from north east are called "chinki" or "nepali"- its just an extension of this. The list could go on but I think you get the drift. There is inherent racism in this country. So lets stop acting as things are perfect.

Somewhere in between all this the concept "one country" vaporizes. Being an Indian, I should be allowed to travel the length and breadth of this country, live anywhere I feel like, work any where I want, dress as I want to. I am part of the idea of one country that India is, and so no one should ask me to change even if I don't fit into the social environment of that place. We all - anyone holding an Indian passport - are Indians first. We need to open our minds - expand our horizons - education can be contributing factor but only to an extent. Beyond that we need to be more accepting, just how we accept the different weathers in the year. But the idea of India has to be paramount. This is as much Irshad's country, as it is Samir's, as it John's, as it is Manjunath's. India is as much a country of the Meitei, as it is of the Kashmiri pandits, as it is of the Buddhists and as it is of anyone - any religion, caste or creed. Racism is prevalent and we all have seen its ugly head come up - in different shape, or size. 

But how do we lead this change? It requires a cultural change and maybe a systemic one as well. We need to learn more about each other - understand each other's history, understand cultural differences, food habits and appreciate it as well. NCERT text books have little history covered for the North Eastern states I am told. There has been a sustained campaign to have it added. It needs development - when people from the rest of the country can travel to the north east states to study/work. When Loktak lake should be as easily identified as would a Dal Lake be. When having Obattu for me would be same as having Bamboo shoot dish for my friend Vinay. But that is just a starting point. We need to do a lot more. We need to be aware of the subtle racist undertones that have become a part of the social fabric of civil society. The entire social fabric has to be repaired. But by whom? By our politicians? No. By the government? No. By you and me. We have to step up and say no. Every time. For any form of racism that we see. If you see your friends at it as well, correct them. To correct this malice needs courage of the highest order - the courage to stop the wrong when we see it. Saying no to racism in a candle light vigil isn't enough - we need to do more. All of us, because this has to stop. Because if not, this will keep coming back and crashing into the idea we all cherish, the idea of one country, one India. 

This needs a change in our mentality - for some it would easier, for some it would be really hard. But we need to try. Because another Lido, Richard, Reigamphy, Bony should never happen - at any cost.

Sunday, February 2, 2014

The word of 2014 - " Women empowerment, system, yada, yada"

The leader who isn't ready yet


So if "Selfie" was the word of 2013, hardly a month into 2014, we may have already found the word for the year, or should i say words for the year. And in no particular order of importance, they are "Women empowerment", "System" and a few more.

 Rahul Gandhi's interview with Arnab Goswami was always going to be in the headlines - for it was the first formal interview that RG gave in his 10 years as a member of parliament (press conferences not withstanding). And then Arnab being Arnab, needs no introduction. There were rumors that RG had been provided the questions in advance, which did a figment of imagination going by how prepared (or unprepared) RG came across as. Another interesting rumor was that RG had been prepped for the interview by two well known PR firms - if this is the quality of their work, the less said the better. Congress has so far miscalculated the play on a few occasions - and this in hindsight wasn't too different. Here was a chance for the heir apparent to come out and stamp his mark in the mind of the countrymen - but, unfortunately what came across was someone who just didnt seem ready to take the lead for his party, forget the country. He came across as someone still caught in the maze - confused may be a closer word. He actually ended up making Arnab look good!  Harsha Bhogle, the famous cricket commentator summed this performance in his tweet.




Though RG needs to be commended for somethings as well - he atleast sat through the questions,though may have repeated his go to phrase in places where it made absolutely no sense, but he sat through. Also he has made some significant changes in the NSUI constitution, making it more of an elected body than nominated. Also maybe his intention are good (i will believe so, if Narendra Modi can talk about secularism), but he has an uphill climb when it comes to becoming a visionary leader or even a leader that i would expect to bring in change. He often has waited far too long to take a stand - something i would expect from someone who is confidant in his beliefs. He speaks in general terms the moment the question is directed at his partymen on corruption - so even if your claim to stake is providing the RTI - you cannot run away from the CWG, 2G,Coal scam etc. Talking about changing the system, bringing equality is great - but did he forget that in the past 60 odd years, Congress has ruled the country for more than 80% time and if things are where they are - a big portion of that blame must lie on his party itself. And the comparison between the 1984 and 2002 riots - he did seem to have put himself in a tight corner. Just as how everyone believes Narendra Modi could have done a lot more to prevent the barbaric killings in Gujrat, so could Congress have done to stop the racial killings of 1984 after Indra Gandhi's murder.

A leader needs to see the bigger picture, needs to be brave enough to admit mistakes, and strong enough to learn from the mistake and move on. A leader shouldn't need a script writer to tell when what his response should be to matters of national importance. A leader should know when to believe in words and when to look beyond it. Manishankar Aiyar on Vikram Chanda's Big Fight show felt that when he saw RG speak at the AICC meet, being an atheist, he still thought he was seeing a reincarnation of Rajiv Gandhi - flattery of the biggest kind or the stupidest thing you have ever heard? RG unfortunately is surrounded by group of such people - and they will do more harm to him than any favors. RG needs to come out on his own - use the support base that he definitely enjoys within his party partly because of his name, and partly because there is a leadership paralysis in the Congress. I think RG's time will come, but not in 2014. He has to walk the talk - he cant say he is against corruption and then go ahead and form a poll alliance with RJD and Laloo Prasad Yadav and say that the alliance is with the party and not the individual. People will see through such statement. So learn to take it on the chin, you will be better off with the experience.